Category: The perfect match

Blurred Lines: The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep5 – When the Experiment Becomes the Reality

The funny thing about intentionally walking into a minefield is that you start to forget what solid ground feels like. Our experiment in dating others was supposed to be illuminating, a way to test the waters of “normal” connection. Instead, each disastrous date felt like another small explosion, propelling Theo and me further into the strange, isolated landscape of our Sundays, a place where unfiltered honesty was the only currency, and the air was getting dangerously thin, the blurred lines of our initial agreement becoming the map of this new territory.

The Dating Charade Continues

Another week, another series of dates that felt more like anthropological studies than genuine attempts at romance. I met a graphic designer named Mark who had an impressive portfolio and an even more impressive ability to talk about himself for two hours straight. I found myself mentally cataloging his conversational narcissism, already composing the summary I’d deliver to Theo.

The vulnerable truths I shared with Theo on Sundays had become my baseline, and Mark’s polished monologue felt like a badly rehearsed play. He was nice enough, I suppose, if “nice enough” meant he didn’t actively insult me. But the entire evening, I was hyper-aware of the performance – his, and the ghost of my old one, which I could no longer comfortably inhabit.

Theo’s report was similarly bleak. He’d met an architect, Amelia, who was, by all accounts, intelligent and engaging. “She asked all the right questions,” he recounted, swirling the coffee in his chipped mug when we met. “But I felt like I was interviewing for a position I didn’t want. Every time I tried to steer us away from the ‘résumé exchange,’ she looked… puzzled.” He confessed that the effort of maintaining surface-level conversation was more exhausting than any of our intense Sunday dissections.

The hidden desires we both harbored – for something deeper, something more resonant – were making the ordinary dating world feel like a barren wasteland, further highlighting the blurred lines of what we were seeking and where we were finding glimpses of it.

Our Sunday Addiction

The truth was, our Sunday meetings had become the axis around which my week revolved. The anticipation wasn’t just about sharing data from our respective dating “fieldwork”; it was about the relief of being able to shed the pretense, to speak without translating, to be met with that unwavering, analytical, yet increasingly familiar gaze from Theo. It was an emotional addiction, this craving for our shared space of radical honesty. The coffee shop, with its background hum of other lives, transformed into our sanctuary, a confessional where the rules of the outside world didn’t apply.

“It’s the only place I don’t feel like I’m failing a test I didn’t study for,” I admitted one Sunday, after recounting a particularly awkward date where I’d accidentally asked the man what his greatest regret was, only to be met with stunned silence and a hasty change of subject.

Theo had nodded, a small, almost imperceptible smile playing on his lips. “Perhaps we’ve simply developed an allergy to small talk.”

“Or maybe,” I’d mused, the thought forming as I spoke it, “we’re just becoming increasingly accustomed to a very specific kind of intensity.” An intensity only we seemed to provide for each other, deepening the blurred lines between our ‘experiment’ and something else entirely.

The Rules Begin to Fray

The problem with creating a game based on avoiding romantic feelings is that the very act of sharing such profound vulnerable truths becomes a breeding ground for intimacy. The blurred lines between “experiment” and something far more complicated were becoming impossible to ignore.

One Sunday, Theo was describing a woman he’d met for a walk in the park – “She actually quoted Rilke, Claire, I almost fell over” – and I felt a distinct, uncomfortable pang. It wasn’t jealousy, not exactly. It was… a disturbance. A sense that the data point was somehow too vivid, too real. I found myself asking, “And did you… like her?” The question hung in the air, more personal than our usual analytical queries.

He’d paused, his gaze sharpening on me. “She was interesting. But the entire time, I found myself wondering how you would have interpreted the way she kept looking at the dogs instead of the river when she talked about loss.”

His deflection was masterful, but the underlying current was there. We were no longer just observing others; we were observing each other, through the lens of these shared experiences, and what we were seeing was becoming dangerously compelling.

The checklist we’d made for each other in that first blush of the game felt like a distant memory, yet elements of it were echoing in our current dynamic with an unsettling accuracy. He was challenging me, and I was noticing when he performed, and the realization that he fit parts of a list I hadn’t consciously made for him was terrifying.

The Question We Can’t Afford to Ask

Last Sunday, after a particularly candid session where we’d both admitted to feeling more isolated than ever despite – or perhaps because of – our dating efforts, a heavy silence settled between us. The unspoken was a living thing in the small space of our table.

“Theo,” I began, the words tentative, “this experiment… its stated goal was to help us connect with other people authentically.” He looked at me, his expression unreadable. “And has it?”

I thought of the hollow dates, the forced conversations, the profound relief of these Sunday debriefs. “I think,” I said slowly, “it’s done the opposite. I think it’s shown me how rare genuine connection is, and how… specific the conditions need to be for me to feel it.”

“Specific to what?” he pressed, his voice quiet.

The answer was there, hanging right in front of me, terrifying and undeniable. Specific to this. To you. But I couldn’t say it. The rules, the stakes, the fear of being the “loser” – though what “losing” even meant anymore was becoming increasingly unclear, lost in the blurred lines of our evolving connection.

“I don’t know,” I lied, breaking eye contact, the first deliberate dishonesty in weeks within our sanctuary. It felt like a betrayal. The air crackled with the unspoken.

He didn’t call me on it. He just nodded, a shadow of disappointment, or perhaps understanding, in his eyes. “Well,” he said, his voice carefully neutral, “more experiments, then.”

As I walked away from the coffee shop that day, the weight of that unspoken truth, that shared, hidden desire for something neither of us dared to name, felt heavier than ever. The experiment wasn’t just becoming reality; it was becoming our reality, where the once-clear rules were now just blurred lines in the sand, a reality that was both a sanctuary and a cage. And the question that throbbed beneath the surface was no longer if the line between research and relationship had disappeared, but what we would do now that these blurred lines defined our every interaction.

---

To be continued in “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep6 – The Accidental Confession” – where an unexpected event pushes the boundaries of their carefully constructed game, and a truth slips out that neither can ignore, forcing them to confront the reality of what they’ve built and what it might cost them.

See also: “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep4 – The Game We Didn’t Know We Were Playing” For insights into navigating complex emotional connections, read “When Honesty Hurts: The Paradox of Radical Truth in Relationships.”

understand why men think “Women in Love: Why Women are Expected to Love First”

The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep4 – The Game We Didn’t Know We Were Playing

When you agree to radical honesty with someone who sees too much, you discover that the most dangerous lies are the ones you’ve been telling yourself.

The Sunday He Didn’t Show Up

I waited forty-three minutes before accepting that Theo wasn’t coming.

The coffee shop filled and emptied around me—couples arguing over weekend plans, students with laptops and determined expressions, elderly men reading newspapers with the patience of people who had nowhere else to be.

I’d prepared for our fourth Sunday meeting with the kind of strategic intensity I usually reserved for work presentations. Had my question ready—something about his relationship with his mother, calculated to be invasive enough to demonstrate the game’s progression but not so invasive as to seem desperate for information.

Instead, I sat alone, feeling foolish in a way I hadn’t experienced since high school.

My phone buzzed at 11:47 AM. A text: Emergency at work. Rain check?

No apology. No explanation of what kind of emergency. No suggestion for when this rain check might occur.

I stared at the message, anger rising. Not just at being stood up, but at how quickly I’d allowed this person back into my life. How easily I’d convinced myself that our strange experiment was different from the usual games people play.

I typed three different responses. Deleted them all. Finally sent: Sure.

Then I went home and spent the rest of Sunday furious at myself for caring more than I’d intended to.

The Call That Changes Nothing

He called Tuesday evening while I was making dinner. I let it go to voicemail, then played the message while stirring pasta that suddenly tasted like cardboard.

“Claire, I know you’re probably… well, I know Sunday was unprofessional. Can we talk?”

I called him back immediately, hating myself for the eagerness in my dialing fingers.

“You said it was an emergency,” I said without preamble.

“It was. Is. My ex-wife called.”

The words hit differently than I expected. Not jealousy, exactly, but something more complicated. A reminder that he had a whole history I wasn’t part of. Stories that didn’t include me.

“I thought she was dead,” I said, remembering his earlier explanation.

“Not dead. Just… absent. She’s been living in Somewhere for two years. Working on a farm, apparently. Growing relationships .” He laughed, but it sounded hollow. “Very unlike the woman I married.”

“And she called because?”

“She wants to finalize our divorce. Officially. We’ve been separated but never… completed the process.” A pause. “She’s engaged to someone else.”

I processed this information, trying to understand why it required missing our meeting. Why it felt like an emergency worthy of disrupting our carefully established routine.

“Congratulations?” I offered, uncertain of the appropriate response.

“The point is,” he continued, “it made me realize something about our arrangement. Our game.”

Something in his tone made me put down my fork.

“Which is?”

“I think I’ve been using it as a way to avoid dealing with the fact that I’m not actually available for authentic connection. Not really. Not yet.”

The honesty was brutal and unexpected. I’d prepared for many things in this conversation, but not for him to dismantle the entire premise of what we’d been doing.

“So you want to stop,” I said. Not a question.

“I want to pause,” he corrected. “Until I can figure out why the idea of my ex-wife marrying someone else made me realize I’ve been treating you like a interesting distraction rather than a actual person.”

The words landed like small stones in still water. Creating ripples I couldn’t control.

“Is that what I am?” I asked quietly. “A distraction?”

“I don’t know,” he said, and the honesty was somehow worse than a lie would have been. “I thought I was ready for this kind of honesty. For whatever this is. But sitting in that lawyer’s office, signing papers to end a marriage that’s been over for years… I realized I have no idea what I want. From you. From anyone.”

The Question I Shouldn’t Ask

We met the following Sunday, but not at the coffee shop. At his suggestion, we walked through Prospect Park instead—moving targets are harder to pin down, harder to study with the kind of intensity our usual conversations required.

“Can I ask you something?” I said as we passed a group of children feeding ducks at the pond.

“Isn’t that the point?”

“This feels different.” I stopped walking, forcing him to face me. “Why did signing divorce papers make you question what we’re doing?”

He looked at me for a long moment, his expression unreadable.

“Because I realized I’ve been treating our honesty experiment like research,” he said finally. “Like I was collecting data about what authentic connection might feel like without actually risking it myself.”

“And now?”

“Now I think maybe I’m incapable of authentic connection. Maybe the reason my marriage failed wasn’t because we weren’t honest enough with each other. Maybe it’s because I’m fundamentally broken in some way that makes real intimacy impossible.”

The confession was raw enough that I felt exposed just hearing it.

“Do you want me to reassure you that you’re not broken?” I asked.

“Do you want to?”

I considered this question seriously. The old me would have rushed to offer comfort, to smooth over his discomfort with gentle lies and encouraging words.

“No,” I said instead. “I want to know if you think I’m broken too.”

The question surprised us both.

“What do you mean?”

“I mean, I’ve been sitting across from you for weeks, telling you truths I’ve never told anyone, and I still don’t know if I’m doing it because I trust you or because I’m desperate to be seen by someone who pays attention.” I started walking again, needing movement to continue this line of honesty. “I’m not sure there’s a difference.”

“Does it matter?” he asked, falling into step beside me.

“It matters if we’re both just using each other to feel less alone without actually risking anything real.”

We walked in silence for several minutes, passing joggers and dog walkers and couples having their own complicated conversations on park benches.

“Your turn,” I said eventually. “Ask me something dangerous.”

“Are you in love with me, or are you in love with being understood?”

The question stopped me again. Not because it was cruel, but because it cut to something I’d been avoiding thinking about too carefully.

“I don’t know,” I admitted. “How do you tell the difference?”

“I have no idea,” he said. “That’s the problem.”

The Realization We Both Resist

“Maybe,” I said as we reached the park’s edge, “we need to add a new rule to the game.”

“Which is?”

“We have to try dating other people.”

The words felt strange coming out of my mouth. Like suggesting we set our comfortable house on fire to see if anything worth saving survived the flames.

“While continuing our Sunday meetings?” he asked.

“Especially while continuing our Sunday meetings. We tell each other about the dates. About how they go. About what we notice about ourselves when we’re with people who don’t know us the way we know each other.”

I could see him processing this suggestion, working through its implications.

“That’s…” he started, then stopped.

“Terrifying?” I supplied.

“I was going to say brilliant. But terrifying works too.”

“It would answer your question about whether we’re broken,” I pointed out. “If we can’t connect authentically with anyone else, maybe the problem isn’t us individually. Maybe it’s this weird hothouse environment we’ve created.”

“And if we can connect with other people?”

“Then we’ll know our honesty experiment worked. We’ll know we learned something about authentic connection that we can take into real relationships.”

“With people who aren’t each other.”

“With people who aren’t each other,” I confirmed.

We’d reached the subway entrance. The natural end of our walk, the point where we usually parted ways with plans for the following Sunday.

“So we’re really doing this?” he asked. “Dating other people while dissecting our experiences with each other?”

“Unless you have a better way to figure out what we’re actually doing here.”

He smiled then, the first genuine smile I’d seen from him all day.

“You know what’s funny?” he said.

“What?”

“A month ago, if someone had suggested I start dating again while conducting weekly honesty sessions with another woman, I would have thought they were insane.”

“And now?”

“Now it seems like the only sane response to an completely insane situation.”

I laughed, surprised by the lightness I felt despite the complexity of what we’d just agreed to.

“Same time next week?” I asked.

“Same time next week,” he confirmed. “But bring stories.”

As I descended into the subway, I found myself wondering if we’d just saved our strange experiment or completely destroyed it.

Either way, I realized, next Sunday was going to be very interesting.

The Dates Begin

I downloaded three dating apps that Tuesday. Not because I was particularly eager to meet someone new, but because the scientific part of me was curious about what dating would feel like now that I’d spent a month practicing radical honesty with someone who saw through all my usual strategies.

My first date was Thursday night. David, thirty-four, investment banker, photos that suggested he spent significant time at the gym and significant money on his clothes.

We met at a wine bar in SoHo—his choice, which immediately told me he was someone who needed to impress before he bothered to connect.

“So,” he said after we’d ordered, “tell me about yourself.”

It was such a standard opening that I almost laughed. After weeks of Theo’s laser-focused questions about my deepest fears and hidden desires, “tell me about yourself” felt like being asked to perform a children’s song at a concert hall.

“What would you like to know?” I replied, genuinely curious about what he’d ask for.

“The usual. What you do, where you’re from, what you’re looking for.”

The usual. As though human connection could be reduced to a standard set of data points.

I gave him the standard answers—the ones I’d perfected years ago, the ones designed to make me seem interesting without being challenging. Professional but not intimidating. Successful but not threatening.

He seemed satisfied with these responses, which told me everything I needed to know about David.

“My turn,” I said when he’d finished cataloging his own achievements. “What’s the most honest thing you’ve said to someone in the past month?”

The question clearly caught him off guard.

“Honest?” he repeated, as though I’d asked him something in a foreign language.

“You know. Truthful. Authentic. Something that revealed who you actually are rather than who you think you should be.”

He thought for several minutes, his expression growing increasingly uncomfortable.

“I guess… I told my mother I was disappointed she couldn’t make it to my birthday dinner?”

It was such a safe, small truth that I felt almost sad for him.

“And what’s the most honest thing someone has said to you?” I pressed.

“Why are you asking such heavy questions?” he asked, forcing a laugh. “This is supposed to be fun.”

And there it was. The difference between someone who wanted to know me and someone who wanted to have a pleasant evening with an attractive woman who wouldn’t complicate his life.

I made it through dinner, but barely. Every minute felt like wearing clothes that no longer fit—constrictive, uncomfortable, wrong.

When he texted the next day asking about a second date, I stared at the message for ten minutes before responding: Thanks, but I don’t think we’re looking for the same thing.

He wrote back immediately: What are you looking for?

I started to type the careful, diplomatic response I’d always given in situations like this. Something about timing and connection and hoping he found what he was looking for.

Instead, I wrote: Someone who asks better questions.

Then I blocked his number before I could lose my nerve.

The Sunday Report

“How did it go?” Theo asked the moment I sat down at our usual table.

“Terrible,” I said without hesitation. “Completely, utterly terrible.”

“Tell me everything.”

So I did. I told him about David’s predictable questions and safe responses. About how performing my old dating persona had felt like wearing a costume that no longer fit. About how I’d ended the evening feeling more alone than I had before it started.

“And you?” I asked when I’d finished. “Please tell me your date was better than mine.”

His expression suggested otherwise.

“Her name was Sarah. Twenty-eight, works in marketing, seemed intelligent from her profile.” He shook his head. “But the entire evening felt like we were reading from a script. She asked about my work, I asked about hers. She told me about her favorite restaurants, I told her about mine. It was perfectly pleasant and completely meaningless.”

“Did you try asking her anything real?”

“I tried. Asked her what she was afraid of. She laughed and said spiders and horror movies.” He looked out the window. “When I pressed for something deeper, she said I was being too intense for a first date.”

“Were you?”

“Probably. But here’s the thing—I couldn’t figure out how to have a surface-level conversation anymore. It felt like speaking a language I’d forgotten how to use.”

We sat in the strange silence of two people who’d accidentally learned something they weren’t sure they wanted to know.

“So what does this mean?” I asked finally.

“I think,” he said slowly, “it means we’ve ruined ourselves for normal dating.”

“Is that good or bad?”

“I have no idea.”

The honesty of his uncertainty felt more intimate than any declaration of love could have.

“Should we keep trying?” I asked. “More dates, I mean.”

“Do you want to?”

I considered this question seriously. The thought of another evening like the one with David made me want to delete every dating app on my phone.

“I want to understand what we’ve done to ourselves,” I said finally. “Whether we’ve learned something valuable about connection or just made ourselves impossible to please.”

“More experiments, then.”

“More experiments,” I agreed.

But as we parted ways that Sunday, I found myself wondering if the real experiment wasn’t the dates we were having with other people.

It was these conversations afterward—these moments of complete honesty about our failures to connect elsewhere.And what that might mean for whatever was happening between us.

To be continued in “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep5 – When the Experiment Becomes the Reality” – where dating other people reveals uncomfortable truths, the safety of Sunday conversations becomes addictive, and the line between research and relationship disappears entirely.

This was “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep4 – The Game We Didn’t Know We Were Playing”.
See also: “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep3 – The Game of Truth” where this dangerous experiment in honesty first began.

For insights into how radical honesty changes your relationship patterns, read “The Authenticity Trap: When Being Real Makes Dating Impossible” where I explore what happens when you can no longer tolerate surface-level connection.

The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep3 – The Game of Truth:
Sometimes the most dangerous thing we can do is agree to be seen without the filters we’ve spent a lifetime perfecting.

The Silence Between Us

Sometimes the easiest thing to do with uncomfortable truths is to pretend you never heard them.

For thirty-seven days, that’s exactly what I did.

I didn’t call Theo after that night in his apartment. Didn’t text. Didn’t “accidentally” show up at places I thought he might be. I erased him with the same careful precision I’d used to erase other uncomfortable realities in my life.

Or at least, I tried to.

The problem was his words. They followed me—to work meetings where I smiled politely while men repeated my ideas back to me. To dinner with friends where I ordered what everyone else was having. To dates with a banker named James who looked perfect on paper but whose kiss left me completely cold.

“I think the real you is much more interesting than the one you’re trying to be.”

I hated him for it. For the presumption. For the way he’d looked at me like he understood something fundamental about me after just a few conversations. For the uncomfortable recognition I’d felt when he’d named the game I’d been playing for so long I’d forgotten it was a game at all.

So I did what any reasonable adult would do: I threw myself into work. Declined social invitations. Canceled my dating apps. Told myself I was taking a break from connection to focus on what really mattered.

The truth? I was hiding. Not just from Theo, but from the possibility that he might be right.

The Call That Wasn’t About Anything

On day thirty-eight, my phone rang. Unknown number. I almost didn’t answer.

“Claire speaking,” I said, professional even on a Saturday.

“It’s Theo.” His voice sounded exactly the same. Steady. Direct. “I need a woman’s perspective on something.”

Not hello. Not how have you been. Not I’ve been thinking about you. Just a straightforward request, as though we’d spoken yesterday instead of over a month ago.

“Oh?” I kept my voice deliberately neutral. “What’s that?”

“How does a man apologize for overstepping without undermining the truth of what he said?”

I almost laughed. Almost hung up. Almost told him exactly where he could put his apology.

Instead, I said: “Coffee might be better for this conversation.”

“Agreed. The place with the chipped mugs? One hour?”

“Fine.”

I hung up, my heart racing with something between anticipation and dread.

The Challenge That Changes Everything

He was already there when I arrived. Not reading this time. Not watching the door. Just sitting with a stillness I’d forgotten was possible.

“You came,” he said as I approached, genuine surprise in his voice.

“I said I would.” I sat down, keeping my coat on. A small barrier. A signal I wouldn’t stay long.

“Thank you.” He pushed a mug toward me. “I remembered—black, no sugar.”

The fact that he’d noticed, that he’d remembered such a small detail, irritated me unreasonably.

“So,” I said, ignoring the coffee. “Your apology.”

He smiled slightly, seeing through my abruptness.

“I’m not actually going to apologize,” he said. “That was just the only way I could think of to get you to talk to me.”

“Manipulative.”

“Effective.”

We stared at each other, a strange tension humming between us.

“What do you really want, Theo?” I asked finally.

He considered the question, his gaze direct in that way that had both attracted and unnerved me from the beginning.

“I want to propose a game,” he said. “An experiment, really.”

“I’m not interested in games.”

“Yes, you are,” he countered. “You’ve been playing one your entire adult life. We both have. The careful editing. The strategic revelation. The performance designed to elicit a specific response.”

I felt heat rise to my cheeks—not embarrassment, but a flare of anger at being so accurately read.

“Fine,” I said, crossing my arms. “What’s this experiment?”

“Complete honesty,” he said simply. “No filters. No editing. No performance. Just… truth.”

“That’s not a game. That’s a recipe for disaster.”

“Maybe,” he agreed. “Or maybe it’s the only way to find out if there’s something real beneath all the careful calculation.”

I studied him, trying to decipher his angle, his motivation.

“Why would I agree to that?” I asked. “What’s in it for me?”

“The chance to prove me wrong,” he said, a slight challenge in his voice. “To show me that I don’t understand you nearly as well as I think I do.”

He knew exactly which button to push. My competitiveness. My desire to maintain control of my own narrative.

“What are the rules?” I asked, already knowing I would say yes.

“We meet regularly—once a week for however long we decide to continue. During those meetings, we agree to absolute honesty. No strategic editing. No performances. We answer any question truthfully, no matter how uncomfortable.”

“That sounds like therapy, not a game,” I observed.

“There’s more,” he said. “We’re not pursuing a relationship. This isn’t dating. This is… anthropological. A study in authentic human connection without romantic agenda.”

“And what’s the point? The objective?”

“To see if it’s possible,” he said simply. “To be completely known by another person without the usual filters we put in place. To discover if that kind of raw honesty is sustainable or if we inevitably retreat back into performance.”

I turned the idea over in my mind, intrigued despite my reservations.

“There should be stakes,” I said finally. “Something to lose. Otherwise, it’s too easy to walk away when it gets uncomfortable.”

He nodded, considering. “What do you suggest?”

“The first person to fall in love loses,” I said, the words out before I fully processed them.

His eyebrows rose slightly.

“Interesting choice,” he said. “And what does losing entail?”

I thought for a moment, a slightly wicked idea forming.

“The loser has to do something genuinely uncomfortable. Something they would never choose for themselves.” I paused, refining the concept. “The winner gets to choose what that is.”

“That could be anything,” he pointed out. “Could be dangerous.”

“Scared?” I challenged.

“Cautious,” he corrected. “We should set some parameters.”

“Fine. Nothing illegal. Nothing physically harmful. Nothing that would jeopardize either of our careers.” I thought for a moment. “But it should be significant. Memorable. A real consequence.”

He considered this, then nodded. “Agreed.”

“One more thing,” I added. “Each of us writes a checklist for the other. The kind of person we think would actually suit them. Not the sanitized version they think they want, but the real, challenging, possibly uncomfortable truth based on what we learn about each other.”

“And after the game ends?”

“We help each other find those people.” I smiled, a bit sharply. “Since we’ll both be such experts on what the other really needs.”

He studied me for a long moment, something like admiration in his eyes.

“You’re good at this,” he said. “Setting up games with built-in protection.”

“What do you mean?”

“The checklist. The helping each other find someone else. It’s clever.” He leaned forward slightly. “It ensures that even if deep connection forms, there’s an exit strategy. A way to frame it as something other than what it might become.”

I felt suddenly exposed, as though he’d read a private thought.

“Are you accepting the terms or not?” I asked, deflecting.

He extended his hand across the table.

“I accept,” he said. “When do we start?”

I took his hand, felt the warmth of his palm against mine. A simple touch that somehow felt more significant than it should have.

“Right now,” I said. “First question: Why did you really call me today? And don’t say it was for a woman’s perspective.”

He smiled, not releasing my hand.

“Because I haven’t been able to stop thinking about you,” he said, the directness of his gaze matching his words. “Because in a month of trying to forget our conversations, I’ve found myself having imaginary continuations of them instead. Because the possibility of something authentic, even if uncomfortable, seems worth pursuing.”

The honesty of it caught me off guard. I’d expected deflection. Strategy. The usual dance.

“Your turn,” he said. “Why did you agree to meet me?”

I could have given him the easy answer. The comfortable one. The one that maintained my dignity and control.

Instead, I took a breath and stepped into our new agreement.

“Because you scare me,” I admitted. “Not in a physical way. In an existential way. Because you see parts of me I’ve spent years carefully hiding. And instead of being repelled by them, you seem… interested.” I paused, forcing myself to maintain eye contact. “And that makes me curious about what would happen if I stopped hiding altogether.”

Something shifted in his expression—surprise, maybe. Or respect. He hadn’t expected such immediate honesty.

“Well,” he said finally, releasing my hand. “I think we have ourselves a game.”

The Rules of Engagement

We spent the next hour defining parameters. Meeting locations (always public). Frequency (weekly, Sundays at 10 AM). Duration (minimum three months, after which either could end the experiment without explanation).

We established boundaries around personal information (financial details off-limits, family histories fair game). Around physical contact (permitted but not required). Around external discussions (what happened in the experiment stayed in the experiment).

And most importantly, we clarified the winning condition: the first person to develop romantic feelings would be the loser, as judged by a mutual admission or by three independent behaviors that clearly indicated romantic interest.

“We should start the checklists now,” Theo suggested as we finished our second round of coffee. “Just the initial impressions. They’ll evolve as we learn more about each other.”

I nodded, pulling out my phone.

“Three qualities,” I said. “Just to begin with. What kind of partner you think I should actually be looking for, based on your observations so far.”

“And you’ll do the same for me?”

“Yes.”

We each spent a few minutes typing, then exchanged phones.

His list for me read:

1. Someone who challenges rather than accommodates you
2. Someone with their own strong ambitions
3. Someone who notices when you’re performing and gently calls you on it

I felt a flutter of unease at how accurately he’d already pegged what I secretly wanted but never admitted to myself.

My list for him was:

1. Someone who doesn’t need your observations to feel seen
2. Someone with a life full enough that your analysis is a choice, not a need
3. Someone who reveals themselves slowly rather than all at once

He read it, his expression thoughtful.

“Interesting,” he said, handing back my phone. “You see more than you let on.”

“So do you,” I replied, returning his phone.

“Next Sunday, then?” he asked, standing.

“Yes,” I agreed. “And I’ll come with a real question. Something that matters.”

As we parted outside the coffee shop, I felt a strange mixture of anticipation and trepidation. This wasn’t dating. Wasn’t friendship, exactly. Wasn’t anything I had a mental category for.

It was an experiment in radical honesty with someone who already saw too much.

An experiment that could end with one of us doing something we’d never choose for ourselves.

An experiment that, even as it began, made something clear: the careful checklist I’d carried for years—the one that had guaranteed I’d never find exactly what I claimed to be looking for—was about to be completely rewritten.

Whether I was ready for that or not.

To be continued in “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep4 – The First Truths” – where initial revelations test boundaries, unexpected vulnerabilities emerge, and the checklists begin to evolve in ways neither anticipated.

This was : “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep3 – The Game of Truth”
See also: “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep2 – Cracks in the Mirror” where the first glimpses of authenticity began to undermine carefully constructed defenses.

For insights into the psychology of authentic connection, read “Love in a Woman’s Perspective”

Sometimes the most dangerous lists are the ones we keep from ourselves.

1- The Art of Almost Connecting

When I was younger, I thought love was a kind of reward.

Now I know it’s more like a mirror—reflecting not just who you are, but who you pretend to be when you think no one is looking closely enough.

Three weeks after writing that checklist—the one carved into the back of my eyelids—I met someone at Leila’s gallery opening. He wasn’t on my radar initially. Not tall enough. Not immediately magnetic enough. Just a man in a corner, studying a painting longer than anyone else in the room.

I noticed him because he was the only person there who seemed to have forgotten he was being seen.

Later, by the wine table, he handed me a glass without meeting my eyes. “The artist is terrified,” he said quietly, as though sharing classified information.

I glanced across the room at Leila, who appeared perfectly composed in her black dress and practiced smile.

“How can you tell?” I asked.

He finally looked at me then. Eyes deep brown, unflinching. “Her paintings tell you everything she won’t.”

Something about the way he said it—like he knew secrets about people they thought they’d hidden well—made me pause. Made me wonder what my own carefully constructed persona might be revealing without my permission.

His name was Theo. No dating profile. No social media presence. A ghost in an age of digital footprints. He wrote for museums—those little placards that explain art to people who aren’t sure what they’re supposed to see.

“So you translate,” I said.

“I interpret,” he corrected. “Big difference.”

We exchanged numbers in that casual way that suggests no particular intention. But as I watched him walk away, I felt something shift—like furniture being rearranged in a room I thought I knew by heart.

2- The First Unsettling

He texted three days later. Not about meeting up or making plans, but to send a photograph of a sculpture—two hands almost touching, the negative space between them more compelling than the hands themselves.

“Reminded me of our conversation“, he wrote.

No elaboration. No question. Just an image and an observation.

I stared at it longer than I care to admit. Trying to decode what he meant. What he saw. What he thought he understood about a conversation that had lasted less than fifteen minutes.

I crafted three different responses, deleted them all, then finally sent: “Beautiful. The space between is always more interesting than the connection itself.”

His reply came quickly: “Exactly. Most people miss that.”

A simple exchange. Inconsequential, really. Yet I found myself returning to it throughout the day. It was different from the usual dance—the careful assessment, the strategic revealing, the calibrated interest.

It felt like a conversation happening in a language I recognized but couldn’t quite speak fluently.

We met for coffee a week later. A Sunday afternoon, which felt safely casual. No alcohol, no dinner-date expectations, just caffeine and daylight and easy exits if needed.

He was already there when I arrived, reading a worn paperback, completely absorbed. I stood watching him for a moment before approaching. Trying to catalog details. Trying to place him in the taxonomy of men I’d dated or considered dating.

But he resisted categorization. His clothes were nice but not showy. His posture relaxed but attentive. His face handsome in an unconventional way—interesting rather than perfect.

When he looked up and saw me, he didn’t smile immediately. Instead, there was this moment of focused attention, like he was really seeing me, not just acknowledging my arrival.

It was disconcerting. I’d perfected the art of being seen on my terms—controlling the angles, managing the impression, curating the experience.

But Theo looked at me like he was reading between my lines.

3- The Questions That Aren’t Really Questions

“Do you always do that?” he asked halfway through our coffee.

“Do what?”

“Think about what you’re going to say next instead of listening.”

I felt heat rise to my face. Not because he was right (though he was), but because no one had ever noticed it before—this conversational sleight of hand I’d mastered years ago.

“I’m listening to you,” I said, defensive.

“You’re hearing me,” he corrected. “Not the same thing.”

There was no judgment in his voice. Just observation. As though he were standing before one of his museum pieces, noting its particular characteristics.

“You catalog people,” I countered, feeling suddenly exposed. “You think you can figure them out like they’re exhibits.”

He smiled then, the first real smile of the afternoon. “Probably. Professional hazard.” He paused, studying me. “What’s your professional hazard?”

The question caught me off guard. I’d prepared to talk about my job—the sanitized, impressive version I shared on first dates. But that wasn’t what he was asking.

“I suppose I…” I started, then stopped, realizing I was about to give my practiced answer. “Actually, I think I treat relationships like marketing campaigns. Always on message. Always on brand.”

The truth surprised me as much as it seemed to interest him.

“And what’s your brand?” he asked, leaning forward slightly.

I opened my mouth to respond, then closed it again. Because suddenly, I wasn’t sure.

What was my brand? The accomplished professional? The low-maintenance girlfriend? The intriguing mystery? I’d been so many different versions with different people that they’d begun to blur together.

“I think I’m still figuring that out,” I finally said.

Theo nodded, like this was the most sensible answer I could have given.

“Good,” he said. “Pre-packaged people are boring anyway.”

4- The Invitation That Wasn’t On The List

We saw each other again. And again. Not dates exactly—at least, I didn’t label them that in my mind. More like ongoing conversations that required physical proximity.

We went to museums (obviously). But also flea markets. Architectural tours of buildings I’d passed a hundred times without really seeing. A community garden where he knew all the volunteers by name.

He moved through the world differently than anyone I’d known before. More present. More curious. Less concerned with how things appeared and more interested in how they actually were.

And gradually, in ways I didn’t immediately recognize, he began to change how I moved through the world too.

I found myself noticing details I’d overlooked before. The pattern of light through leaves. The different cadences in strangers’ laughter. The small kindnesses exchanged between people who thought no one was watching.

“You’re developing museum eyes,” Theo told me one afternoon as I pointed out a particular shade of blue in a painting we were examining.

“Is that a good thing?”

“It’s a real thing,” he said. “Which is always better than a good thing that isn’t real.”

There was that unsettling directness again. The sense that he was looking straight past my carefully constructed exterior.

“What do you see when you look at me?” I asked suddenly. The question had been circling in my mind for weeks.

He didn’t answer immediately. Didn’t rush to reassure me with compliments or deflect with humor.

“I see someone who’s afraid of being disappointing,” he said finally. “Which is interesting, because you’re the least disappointing person I’ve met in a long time.”

The words landed like stones dropping into still water. Creating ripples I couldn’t control.

Because he was right. Again. My entire life had been constructed around a terror of disappointing people. Of being less than they expected. Less accomplished. Less interesting. Less lovable.

It was why I had the checklist to begin with—not just for others, but for myself. A constant measuring stick for my own worthiness.

“How did you know that?” I asked, my voice smaller than I intended.

He shrugged. “It’s what artists do—we look for the truth hiding in plain sight.”

“You’re not an artist,” I pointed out. “You write about art.”

“Same difference,” he said. “We’re all trying to make sense of what we see.”

5- The Night Everything Shifted

It happened six weeks after we met.

Theo invited me to a small gathering at his apartment—not a party exactly, more of a salon. A handful of people discussing ideas over wine and simple food.

I spent an embarrassing amount of time deciding what to wear. What version of myself to present. What impression to make on these people who mattered to him.

His apartment was exactly as I’d imagined it would be—books everywhere, art on every wall, furniture chosen for comfort rather than style. But there was something else too, something I hadn’t anticipated.

Photographs. Dozens of them. Not displayed prominently, but tucked into bookshelves, propped on side tables, pinned to a corkboard in the kitchen.

And in many of them, the same woman. Dark hair, bright eyes, a smile that suggested she was about to tell you a secret.

I froze, wineglass halfway to my lips, a strange cold sensation spreading through my chest.

Theo noticed. Of course he noticed. He noticed everything.

“That’s Eliza,” he said quietly, coming to stand beside me as I stared at a particular photo—Theo and this woman, foreheads touching, eyes closed, sharing some private moment that felt almost too intimate to witness.

“Your girlfriend?” I asked, hating how hopeful I sounded when I added, “Ex-girlfriend?”

A shadow crossed his face. Something dark and complicated.

“Not exactly,” he said.

Before he could elaborate, other guests arrived. The moment passed. The conversation moved on.

But throughout the evening, I found my eyes drawn back to those photographs. To Eliza. To the obvious connection she shared with Theo. To the mystery of who she was and why she was everywhere in his space but nowhere in his present.

Later, as people were leaving, I lingered. Helped clear glasses. Folded napkins that didn’t need folding.

“You want to ask about her,” Theo said when we were finally alone.

It wasn’t a question.

“Is it that obvious?”

“You’ve looked at her pictures seventeen times. I counted.”

I felt my face flush. “Sorry. I didn’t mean to be…”

“Curious? Don’t apologize for curiosity. It’s your best quality.”

He moved to the bookshelf, took down a particular photograph—Eliza looking over her shoulder, laughing at something out of frame.

“She was my wife,” he said simply.

The past tense hung in the air between us. Heavy. Significant.

“What happened?” I asked, though some part of me already knew the answer. Could feel it in the careful way he held the photograph. In the reverence of his gaze.

Theo was quiet for a long moment. So long I thought he might not answer.

Then, “That’s a story for another time,” he said, returning the photo to its place on the shelf. “But I will tell you something about Eliza that might help you understand me better.”

I waited, barely breathing.

“She’s the reason I can see through people’s performances,” he said. “Because she never performed. Not once in all the time I knew her. She was always exactly herself—messy, complicated, completely real.”

He looked at me then, really looked at me, in that way that made me feel like all my careful layers were being peeled back one by one.

“That kind of authenticity… once you’ve experienced it, everything else feels like watching actors recite lines. Even very good actors. Even very good lines.”

I felt a chill run through me. Was that all I’d been to him? An actor reciting very good lines?

“Why spend time with me, then?” I asked, the question escaping before I could contain it. “If I’m just… performing?”

His expression softened. “Because every once in a while, when you forget to be careful, I see glimpses of someone real. Someone worth waiting for.”

The words should have felt flattering. Instead, they terrified me.

Because what if he was waiting for someone who didn’t exist? What if, beneath all my careful performances, there was nothing authentic to discover?

What if I’d been playing roles for so long that I’d forgotten who I was when the curtain closed?

“I should go,” I said, suddenly desperate for air. For distance. For the safety of my own carefully controlled environment.

Theo didn’t try to stop me. Just walked me to the door, his hand light against the small of my back.

“For what it’s worth,” he said as I stepped into the hallway, “I think the real you is much more interesting than the one you’re trying to be.”

I looked back at him, this man who somehow saw through every defense I’d spent years perfecting.

“And if you’re wrong?” I asked. “If there is no real me anymore?”

He smiled then, sad and knowing.

“Then I’m wrong,” he said simply. “But I don’t think I am.”

As the door closed between us, I stood frozen in the hallway, my heart racing with something between terror and exhilaration.

Because despite everything—despite the mysterious Eliza, despite being seen in ways I wasn’t ready to be seen, despite the growing suspicion that I’d been hiding from myself for longer than I could remember—I knew one thing with absolute certainty:

I would see Theo again.

And next time, I wouldn’t be so careful.

See also: “The Myth of the Perfect Match: Ep1 – A Checklist Folded in Half” where my journey began with impossible standards and careful measurements.

For insights on recognizing if you are on a healthy relationship, read “12 Signs You’re in a Healthy Relationship” .

When I was younger, I thought love was a kind of reward.
You lived well, you learned patience, you smiled politely at the right moments, and somewhere down the road — you got handed your prize.
The perfect match.

I never said it out loud, of course. That would sound desperate. But inside, I was quietly measuring every conversation, every glance, every joke.
Was he funny enough?
Was he ambitious enough?
Would he know how to read the sadness when it decided to show up without an invitation?

I had a list, somewhere between mental and magical. Not written in ink — more like carved into the back of my eyelids.
Strong, but gentle.
Confident, but kind.
Serious about me, but casual with life.
Romantic, but not cheesy.
Stable, but not boring.

I met people.
I made small talk at crowded parties, laughed at jokes I didn’t really hear, let myself believe that maybe the checklist could flex a little here, stretch a little there.
You can’t build a life out of bullet points, I told myself.
But at night, lying on my back with the ceiling fan carving circles into the dark, I knew I was still measuring.
Still waiting.

And maybe that’s where the first crack appeared — not in the people I met, but in me.
Because the longer I chased the perfect match, the more I started realizing:
I wasn’t sure if I was even the version of myself that could meet him.

I wanted honesty but hid my fears.
I wanted loyalty but left doors half-open behind me.
I wanted depth but offered carefully edited stories.

Maybe I wasn’t looking for a match.
Maybe I was just looking for someone to make it all make sense.

The funny thing is — when the first real one showed up, he didn’t fit the list at all.
And I’ll tell you about him.
But not yet.

First, you need to know what it feels like when a dream starts changing shape in your hands.